{
  "schema": "demandbox.citations/1",
  "generatedAt": "2026-08-28T15:51:47.690Z",
  "piece": {
    "kind": "blog",
    "slug": "signal-based-selling-is-a-routing-problem",
    "title": "Signal-based selling is a routing problem, not a data problem",
    "url": "https://demandbox.co/blog/signal-based-selling-is-a-routing-problem",
    "published": "2026-08-24"
  },
  "claims": [
    {
      "blockIndex": 4,
      "blockType": "keyStat",
      "value": "19%",
      "claim": "Current average win rates for B2B opportunities, dropping from previous benchmarks of 29%.",
      "sourceId": "ebstaPavilion",
      "sourced": true,
      "hedged": false,
      "confidence": "sourced"
    },
    {
      "blockIndex": 12,
      "blockType": "statRow",
      "value": "342",
      "claim": "B2B SaaS companies analyzed for GTM motion benchmarks.",
      "sourceId": "benchmarkit",
      "sourced": true,
      "hedged": false,
      "confidence": "sourced"
    },
    {
      "blockIndex": 16,
      "blockType": "table",
      "value": "Tier 1: Critical / Personalized video or phone call within 1 hour / Tier 2: High / Tier 3: Moderate",
      "claim": "Defining response levels based on signal strength and account fit.",
      "sourced": false,
      "hedged": false,
      "confidence": "illustrative-model"
    },
    {
      "blockIndex": 20,
      "blockType": "table",
      "value": "Tier 1: High Intent / Direct outbound call and personalised email within 30 minutes. / Tier 2: Relevant Change / Tier 3: Passive Interest",
      "claim": "A standard framework for categorising sales signals and assigning routing ownership.",
      "sourced": false,
      "hedged": true,
      "confidence": "illustrative-model"
    },
    {
      "blockIndex": 28,
      "blockType": "keyStat",
      "value": "19%",
      "claim": "Average win rates fell to this level from 29 percent, highlighting the need for higher precision in how sales teams engage with opportunities.",
      "sourceId": "ebstaPavilion",
      "sourced": true,
      "hedged": false,
      "confidence": "sourced"
    },
    {
      "blockIndex": 35,
      "blockType": "statRow",
      "value": "342",
      "claim": "B2B SaaS and AI-native companies analysed for GTM motion benchmarks.",
      "sourceId": "benchmarkit",
      "sourced": true,
      "hedged": false,
      "confidence": "sourced"
    },
    {
      "blockIndex": 35,
      "blockType": "statRow",
      "value": "20%",
      "claim": "Median Win Rate from Pipeline",
      "sourceId": "causoGtm",
      "sourced": true,
      "hedged": false,
      "confidence": "sourced"
    },
    {
      "blockIndex": 47,
      "blockType": "keyStat",
      "value": "19%",
      "claim": "Average win rates for B2B opportunities have recently declined from 29 percent to 19 percent, highlighting the need for higher precision in targeting.",
      "sourceId": "ebstaPavilion",
      "sourced": true,
      "hedged": false,
      "confidence": "sourced"
    },
    {
      "blockIndex": 49,
      "blockType": "statRow",
      "value": "342",
      "claim": "B2B SaaS companies analyzed for GTM motion efficiency",
      "sourceId": "benchmarkit",
      "sourced": true,
      "hedged": false,
      "confidence": "sourced"
    },
    {
      "blockIndex": 49,
      "blockType": "statRow",
      "value": "H1 2026",
      "claim": "Current period for GTM benchmark data including CAC payback",
      "sourceId": "causoGtm",
      "sourced": true,
      "hedged": false,
      "confidence": "sourced"
    }
  ],
  "sources": [
    {
      "id": "ebstaPavilion",
      "title": "GTM Benchmarks: Win Rates, Cycles, and Pipeline",
      "publisher": "Ebsta and Pavilion, via PipelineGrader",
      "published": "2026-07-04",
      "kind": "benchmark",
      "method": "655,000 opportunities and 48 billion dollars of pipeline analysed; average win rates fell to 19 percent from 29 percent year over year.",
      "url": "https://pipelinegrader.com/insights/b2b-pipeline-cac-benchmarks",
      "finalUrl": "https://pipelinegrader.com/insights/b2b-pipeline-cac-benchmarks",
      "linkStatus": "ok",
      "linkCheckedAt": "2026-08-26T14:52:46.360Z",
      "freshness": "fresh",
      "freshnessWindowMonths": 12,
      "expiresOn": "2027-07-04"
    },
    {
      "id": "benchmarkit",
      "title": "2026 SaaS and AI Metrics Benchmarks",
      "publisher": "Benchmarkit",
      "published": "2026-06-01",
      "kind": "benchmark",
      "method": "342 B2B SaaS and AI native companies segmented by size, ACV, pricing model, and go to market motion.",
      "url": "https://www.benchmarkit.ai/2026-saas-ai-native-metrics",
      "finalUrl": "https://www.benchmarkit.ai/2026-saas-ai-native-metrics",
      "linkStatus": "ok",
      "linkCheckedAt": "2026-08-26T14:52:46.360Z",
      "freshness": "fresh",
      "freshnessWindowMonths": 12,
      "expiresOn": "2027-06-01"
    },
    {
      "id": "causoGtm",
      "title": "H1 2026 B2B SaaS GTM Benchmark Report",
      "publisher": "Causo",
      "published": "2026-06-21",
      "kind": "benchmark",
      "method": "Synthesis of H1 2026 investor facing GTM benchmarks: CAC payback, magic number, win rate by segment, and pipeline coverage.",
      "url": "https://hub.causo.ai/guides/h1-2026-b2b-saas-gtm-report",
      "finalUrl": "https://hub.causo.ai/guides/h1-2026-b2b-saas-gtm-report",
      "linkStatus": "ok",
      "linkCheckedAt": "2026-08-26T14:52:46.360Z",
      "freshness": "fresh",
      "freshnessWindowMonths": 12,
      "expiresOn": "2027-06-21"
    }
  ],
  "revisions": [],
  "totals": {
    "claims": 10,
    "sourced": 8,
    "unsourced": 2,
    "staleSources": 0
  }
}